People are different; at every age they have different responsibilities, goals, knowledge and skills, financial resources, and families. And that is to say nothing of all the other aspects of the human race that are different. I believe we are definitely heading in the right direction as we customize learning opportunities for the populations we serve. However, in some cases we are hampering learning. Some organizations want people to learn on their own time at home. Homes and home responsibilities are not the same and handicap some learners.
Public Schools in Massachusetts, where I live, are following the “common core” concept.
http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/
“The Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy (ELA). These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade.”
This makes me worry. While there are good aspects to this practice there are likely as many bad results that will impact students both now, while they are in school and later, as they enter a world that doesn’t have a common training algorithm. I also know of many smart students who are getting bored and tuning out.
However, I’m hopeful that people who do the planning for students will recognize that different people learn differently. For example this Forbes post talks to the importance of focusing on the individual rather than the one-size concept.
“Training in the past that focused solely on content was “one size fits all,” which made it difficult to engage with the learner. Today, we must zero in on the learner, including his or her experience, work environment, performance and technological fluency, to create a training program. Any effective training program is one developed for the individual and offers social activities to share their experiences.”
I think the key concept that will bring new and interesting results is the importance of meeting the needs of each individual. However, we need to be careful in how we implement our programs. If we aren’t careful, we could find that although we are getting good results, the financial impact could derail the good work.
Like with any other learning event, it is important to begin by identifying all the end results. End results are all of the things that any individual will need to be able to do on the job related to the training needed. Once you have listed all of the activities needed then, as with any other learning event, identify all the things they will need to know. It is very important to identify what they will need to do before you identify what they will need to know. The “doing” informs the knowing.
When customizing training for specific individuals, I recommend that you develop all the instruction in mini modules. All of the good practices that you have used to develop learning events apply here. The only difference is that you will be developing multiple mini (and perhaps micro) modules that are complete onto themselves so that they can be pulled together in a learning event customized for an individual.
Everything that has worked in full learning events applies here. Use whatever methodology you believe will be appropriate to deliver the learning experience to the individual. It may be that you want to use Gamification for some lessons and some learners. You may find that other techniques will work for other learners. The important concept is that one size does not fit all and you must customize to meet each learners needs. But, stay focused on the end results needed and what needs to be known to achieve those end results.
So yes, different people learn differently and if we want everyone to get as much out of our events as possible, we owe it to them to customize our output. While it can be challenging to constantly adapt and change a learning event to meet individual needs, I believe the resulting learning is well worth it.